Product Review | Chapman ThermoBarrel Insulated Stainless Mash Tun

Author: Ray Found


After making my first batch of beer, an Irish Red Ale extract kit, I was certain I wanted to take the next step and start brewing all-grain. While the commentary online led me to believe it was somewhere between trivially easy and ultra-complicated, I was undeterred and cobbled together a MLT out of an infrequently used 48 quart cooler, some brass and nylon fittings from the hardware store, and a short section of washing machine supply hose. I was a real brewer, I told myself.

01_thermobarrelrev1_oldsetup

And so it went for the first year or so, until the bug to brew larger batches bit and I transferred my fittings to a new 70 quart Coleman Xtreme.

06_Startervial_Mashtun

I’ll be the first to admit these plastic coolers work great. Besides pretty affordable, they hold temperature well, clean up easily, and generally get the job done just fine. But they never struck me as perfect. For one, I have to stack a bunch of fender washers on the outside of the cooler to get the fittings to pull up tight enough against the inside wall to seal, but not so tight as to crush the plastic walls of the cooler, causing it to deform and leak. Similar story with the valve on the outside of the cooler. On two occasions, I had leaks develop that required me to drain my strike water, reassemble the cooler, and start my brew day over. Not devastating, but annoying.

Another minor quibble I’ve always had about cooler MLTs is they’re not specifically rated for hot food contact. There’s a boatload of speculation out there about the safety of consuming beer made with such coolers, but it’s difficult to know for sure since every brand could potentially be made from different materials. My inclination is that manufacturers won’t explicitly endorse using their coolers as mash tuns since that would cause them to accept some degree of liability, but they’re likely completely safe. A small issue that nagged my obsessive mind.

Finally, I’ve always wanted a thermometer on my mash tun. While I prefer a high-accuracy handheld thermometer for mashing in, being able to read the temp without opening the tun has always appealed to me, as it would allow me to more readily observe and correct for drops in temperature. Again, not a major issue, I’ve dropped a probe thermometer in my MLT before and it worked fine, I just think something built-in would be nice.

With my dedication to the exBEERimental cause and a growing number of ideas that required separate mashes, I was preparing to piece together another MLT to match the one I already had. The timing couldn’t have better, as this was right about when Chapman Equipment contacted us to see if we might be interested in reviewing some of their new gear. After going over our standard product review policies, I agreed to review what seemed to me to be a pretty rad alternative to the plastic cooler MLT.

ChapmanBrewingEquipment_Logo_2

Two 15 gallon Chapman Equipment ThermoBarrels arrived about a week  later, they were packaged very well, and I could barely contain my excitement. I opened the boxes right in our front room, not even taking them to the garage where they would ultimately reside. They were so pretty!

02_thermobarrelrev1_unpackaged

Each ThermoBarrel is essentially two stainless kettles, an inner and an outer stacked together, with insulation sandwiched between them. This is putting it very simply, as there is clearly a lot of specialized design and components that go into them. For example, they have 3 ports, one for the diptube and valve, another for a thermometer, and one near the top for a sparge arm or recirculation rig. For a simple batch sparger like me, the top port conveniently includes a threaded plug to render it sealed. All I added were stainless elbows, as I’ve found they make wort collection slightly easier.

03_thermobarrelrev1_valveelbows

As a long time user of a stainless mesh toilet braid, I originally planned to replace the included false bottom with these, mainly because it’s what I was comfortable and familiar with. Eventually, and after a couple frustrating trips to the hardware store, I ended up performing a simple test with water to see if the braid would really allow the tun to drain better than the included diptube, the rationale I’d given myself for why I didn’t want the false bottom. Nope, I’m a fucking moron. To my surprise, the diptube and false bottom actually worked better and didn’t require any tilting like my cooler MLT, the ThermoBarrel drained effectively when flat.

I’ve seen many DIY MLT builds featuring silicone tubing connecting the false bottom to the outlet, which seems risky to me. I really like the ThermoBarrel’s rigid stainless diptube because it can’t get damaged or knocked off easily with an errant mash stirring device, as I recently witnessed during a brewing demo at a club meeting. Not fun!

12_thermobarrel1_diptube

I was excited to put these tuns to work for the first time and figured I’d use my normal procedure of overheating the strike water by about 7°F/4°C to allow for the MLT to pre-heat. Following this step, I mashed in then left for about 3 hours to watch my daughter play T-ball. When I returned, I found the temperature had dropped a mere 2°F/1°C, slightly better than what I got from my cooler MLTs in the past when left for a similar duration.

I compared the on-board thermometers to the digital one I use and found they were fairly accurate out of the box, though one initially read about 2°F/1°C high, which I easily corrected using the calibration screw on the back. I was beyond pleased with the tight, positive seal provided by the cam-latched lid that allowed absolutely no steam to escape.

05_thermobarrelrev1_lid

Despite being 10 quarts smaller than my Coleman Xtreme MLT, I found the ThermoBarrel splashed less while stirring thanks to its taller and narrower shape.

06_thermobarrelrev1_fulltun

In every use, I’ve experienced smooth lautering with no significant intrusion of grain particles, the grain bed and false bottom teaming up to effectively filter everything out following a brief vorlauf.

15_thermobarrelreview1_lautering
That’s not water, but the very clear runoff for a batch of German Pils

Cleaning the ThermoBarrel is quick and easy. Using my garden hose, I spray the inside until clean, rinse the ball valves thoroughly, then set the tuns upside down on a towel while I finish brewing. After each brew day, I store the units right-side-up with the lids off, which conveniently hang from the side of the mash tun.

07_thermobarrelrev1_lidontuns

The biggest thing I do differently with my ThermoBarrels compared to my cooler MLTs is wipe them down with a towel to ensure they’re dry before storing. Not because the stainless couldn’t take the water, of course it can, but because I don’t want waters spots all over my beautiful, shiny, mash tuns. Pure vanity.

08_thermobarrelrev1_shiny

Another small but surprisingly convenient aspect of the ThermoBarrel is the lip on the bottom that makes dumping the grains a snap.

09_thermobarrelrev1_bottom

I was curious how the ThermoBarrel would perform with a more traditional fly sparge configuration, a method I’d never performed. Using my old cooler MLT as a HLT, I made a batch of beer using this classic approach.

10_thermobarrelrev1_fly

It went off without a hitch, the grain bed set nicely and it lautered as smoothly as before, getting me slightly higher efficiency than I’m used to. I’ll continue batch sparging because I find the process easier, but it’s nice to know the ThermoBarrel can be used effectively for various methods.

| THE VERDICT |

From a longevity standpoint, nothing beats stainless, and I look forward to many years of brewing with my ThermoBarrels. I’m not one for hyperbole and tend to cut right to the chase, so here it is, a direct quote from an email I sent when asked how my experience with the the mash tuns was going: I fucking love these things! Seriously, they’re great, about as close to ideal as anything I could think of. The only real negative I can come up with, besides the fact they required cleaning before first use (as all things do), is they can’t be placed over a direct flame, doing so would melt the insulation. While I personally have no desire for such stringent temperature regulation, those who do may view this as being a drawback. Other than that, I’ve little doubt these mash tuns will be with me long into the future.

The ThermoBarrel is certainly a premium product that’s built like a tank with a price tag commensurate with the materials used and construction quality. I’ve seen many non-insulated mash tuns on the market that cost at least as much, usually more, than what Chapman Equipment is offering. But yeah, it’s not cheap. Whether you prefer batch sparge, fly sparge, no sparge, or BIAB, the ThermoBarrel offers a great value for homebrewers interested in a stainless option for mashing.

ThermoBarrels are in 10 gallon, 15 gallon, and 20 gallon sizes, be sure to select the one the best suits your brewing needs!

If you have any questions or comments about the Chapman Equipment ThermoBarrel, you can leave a comment below.


Support Brülosophy In Style!

tshirts_all

All designs are available in various colors and sizes on Amazon!


Follow Brülosophy on:

FACEBOOK   |   TWITTER   |   INSTAGRAM


patreon_banner


| Read More |

18 Ideas to Help Simplify Your Brew Day
 7 Considerations for Making Better Homebrew
 List of completed exBEERiments 
 How-to: Harvest yeast from starters
How-to: Make a lager in less than a month 


| Good Deals |

Brand New 5 gallon ball lock kegs discounted to $75 at Adventures in Homebrewing
 ThermoWorks Super-Fast Pocket Thermometer On Sale for $19 – $10 discount
 Sale and Clearance Items at MoreBeer.com


If you enjoy this stuff and feel compelled to support Brulosophy.com, please check out the Support Us page for details on how you can very easily do so. Thanks!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

23 thoughts on “Product Review | Chapman ThermoBarrel Insulated Stainless Mash Tun”

    1. Yeah, these are not intended to be direct heated. They have Styrofoam insulation between the two layers, so I can’t imagine what would happen if you put these on your burner.

    2. You can’t use direct heat on them, it would melt the insulation (as stated in “The Verdict” above).

      My current cooler mashtun is a 42qt cube, so to replace it with this would be $320 (10gal), plus shipping… My cube, bazooka screen, bottling spigot, gaskets and brass stepdown were about $65 total. A big advantage over my Ice Cube cooler would be a direct-fire capable mash tun, but as stated, it can’t handle direct-fire. I’m all about shiny brew parts, but this seems much more of a luxury item than a home-brewery necessity.

      1. Awesome, thank you! I’ve been eyeing these up for a while and have been waiting for a good review. After reading this positive review, I’m pulling the trigger.

        Brulosophy has seriously been a fantastic home brewing resource for me. Keep up the great work!

  1. That is a fine piece of gear, but I can’t justify to my wife (or myself) spending upwards of $500 to replace a piece of equipment I made (cooler mash tun) for ~$75. If I were rich, though…

  2. Disappointing to hear about the inability to apply direct heat. I’ll just have to stick with what I currently have and layers of reflectix. That being said, top notch review as always.

  3. Very interesting, they look exactly like the thermoports which are pretty common for brewing here in europe. Here is an example of the 70 liter version I am using: http://www.chicco.beer/uploads/6/0/3/6/60368031/8177050_orig.jpg

    On Amazon Germany the 70L (18.5 Gallons) is about 135 Euros, but I don’t know if any supplier ships to the US. And of course they do not come with all the features.
    http://www.amazon.de/Edelstahl-Thermoport-50×50-Hahn-Deckel/dp/B007EPLMGU/ref=sr_1_3?s=kitchen&ie=UTF8&qid=1449826957&sr=1-3&keywords=thermoport

    Instead of a false bottom it is common to use a Lautering-Device which is called “Läuterhexe” (Lautering Which):
    http://www.mattmill.de/laeuterhexe/

      1. Must be, or even bought from Thermoport. But getting a thermoport (if possible in the us), a 3-piece valve and a false bottom as welll as a thermometer seperately would be about half the price 😉

    1. I love seeing and reading about the various solutions from different minds, places etc, to a common “problem”. Thanks for sharing.

  4. Scott Pintabone

    Late question to this review, but starting to consider stainless mash tun options and does the false bottom sit across the entire bottom of the tun? In the pictures it looks like there might be an inch or so between the edge of the false bottom and the wall of the mash tun. Does this cause any issues where the water could potentially lift the bottom allowing the grain to sneak through the bottom of the false bottom?

    Hopefully I asked that clearly enough.

    1. Yeah, there is a space (It is a domed false bottom). I mean, there may be some hypothetical movement or something happening there, but, I can’t obviously go underneath the grainbed to look. Whatever may be happening, it is a non issue. I run a couple quart passes of vorlauf and it runs pretty clean.

  5. The original review was from 2015. Looking at the current product photos on chapmanequipment.com it appears the stainless dip tube has been replaced by silicone tubing. Can any recent purchasers confirm or deny this?

Let us know what you think!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up to be notified when we publish new content!

Thank you to our sponsors!

Brülosophy is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and other affiliated sites.
Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro

Ads Blocker Detected!!!

We have detected that you are using extensions to block ads. Please support us by disabling these ads blocker.

Powered By
Best Wordpress Adblock Detecting Plugin | CHP Adblock
Scroll to Top